Este sitio web utiliza cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar la experiencia de navegación, y ofrecer contenidos y servicios de interés. Al continuar la navegación entendemos que aceptas nuestra política de cookies. Para más información consulta aquí.

MSF OCP : Diminuer notre empreinte environnementale

Construire la feuille de route environnementale de MSF OCP

Fase 2 de 5
PHASE 2 ELABORATION DES PROPOSITIONS 01/12/2021 - 15/01/2022
Ver las fases

Cambios en "Sterilisation VS single use"

Comparar el modo de visualización:

Título

  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
Supresiones
Adiciones
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
Supresiones
Adiciones
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}

Cuerpo

  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Supresiones
Adiciones
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Supresiones
Adiciones
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Número de versión 1 de 1 Mostrar todas las versiones Volver a la propuesta
Autoría de la versión
Avatar: Daoudal FX Daoudal FX
Versión creada el 13/01/2022 15:05