Ce site utilise des cookies. En continuant à parcourir le site, vous acceptez notre utilisation des cookies. En savoir plus à ce sujet ici.

MSF OCP : Diminuer notre empreinte environnementale

Construire la feuille de route environnementale de MSF OCP

Étape 2 sur 5
PHASE 2 ELABORATION DES PROPOSITIONS 01/12/2021 - 15/01/2022
Voir les étapes

Changements sur "Sterilisation VS single use"

Sélectionner le mode de vue :

Titre

  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
Suppressions
Ajouts
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
Suppressions
Ajouts
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}

Corps du texte

  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Suppressions
Ajouts
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Suppressions
Ajouts
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Numéro de version 1 sur 1 Afficher toutes les versions Retourner à la proposition
Auteur de la version
Avatar: Daoudal FX Daoudal FX
Version créée le 13/01/2022 15:05