This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
The Climate Action Accelerator
  • English Choose language Choisir la langue Elegir el idioma
    • Français
    • Castellano
Sign In
  • Home
  • Help

MSF - OCP's Global Environmental Footprint Initiative

Building MSF OCP environmental roadmap

Phase 2 of 5
PHASE 2: PROPOSALS 01/12/2021 - 15/01/2022
Process phases
  • The process
  • How-to
  • Phase 1 : State of affairs
  • Phase 2 : Proposals
chevron-left Back to list

Going vegan is the most important thing MSF can do for the environment -Make all food provided in the field and HQs vegan.

Avatar: Rosie Wilsom Rosie Wilsom
14/12/2021 10:54  
Meat & dairy are in the top 3 most environmentally damaging industries, producing 60% of agriculture’s greenhouse gas emissions & cause acidification, eutrophication & excessive water use.
-Without meat/dairy consumption, farmland could be reduced by 75% & still feed the world. Loss of wild areas to agriculture is the leading cause of mass extinction.
-Human health concerns - eg antibiotic resistance from intensive farming.
  • Filter results for category: 8. OTHERS 8. OTHERS

List of Endorsements

Avatar: judith judith
Endorsements count1
Going vegan is the most important thing MSF can do for the environment -Make all food provided in the field and HQs vegan. Comments 3

Reference: caa-PROP-2021-12-201
Version number 1 (of 1) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: 2b501957d84215f7261043da42aa61f6ad14315d7db2d1fcf9f8d7ccd7256307

Source: {"body":{"en":"Meat & dairy are in the top 3 most environmentally damaging industries, producing 60% of agriculture’s greenhouse gas emissions & cause acidification, eutrophication & excessive water use.\r\n-Without meat/dairy consumption, farmland could be reduced by 75% & still feed the world. Loss of wild areas to agriculture is the leading cause of mass extinction. \r\n-Human health concerns - eg antibiotic resistance from intensive farming.","machine_translations":{"es":"La carne y los productos lácteos se encuentran entre las tres industrias más perjudiciales para el medio ambiente, ya que producen el 60% de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero de la agricultura y provocan la acidificación, la eutrofización y el uso excesivo de agua.\r\n-Sin el consumo de carne/lácteos, las tierras de cultivo podrían reducirse en un 75% y seguir alimentando al mundo. La pérdida de áreas silvestres en favor de la agricultura es la principal causa de extinción masiva.\r\n-Preocupación por la salud humana, por ejemplo, la resistencia a los antibióticos debido a la agricultura intensiva.","fr":"La viande et les produits laitiers font partie des trois industries les plus nuisibles à l'environnement, produisant 60 % des émissions de gaz à effet de serre de l'agriculture et provoquant une acidification, une eutrophisation et une utilisation excessive de l'eau.\r\n-Sans la consommation de viande et de produits laitiers, les terres agricoles pourraient être réduites de 75 % tout en continuant à nourrir le monde. La perte de zones sauvages au profit de l'agriculture est la principale cause d'extinction massive.\r\n-Problèmes de santé humaine - par exemple, résistance aux antibiotiques due à l'agriculture intensive."}},"title":{"en":"Going vegan is the most important thing MSF can do for the environment -Make all food provided in the field and HQs vegan.","machine_translations":{"es":"Ser vegano es lo más importante que puede hacer MSF por el medio ambiente: hacer que todos los alimentos que se suministran en el terreno y en la sede sean veganos.","fr":"Devenir végétalien est la chose la plus importante que MSF puisse faire pour l'environnement -Rendre végétalienne toute la nourriture fournie sur le terrain et au siège."}}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://participation.climateactionaccelerator.org/processes/OCP/f/49/proposals/201/embed.js?locale=en"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://participation.climateactionaccelerator.org/processes/OCP/f/49/proposals/201/embed.html?locale=en" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

3 comments

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
Avatar: Caroline Blondel Caroline Blondel
29/12/2021 18:10
  • Get link Get link

Besides the fact that I believe it is not up to MSF to impose a specific food diet to it's employees, I don't think that the meat and dairy purchased locally in our projects come from the worst type of farming you describe. Where I've been it was usually very local and produced traditionnally rather than by carbon-intensive production means (I would assume it is the case in most places where we work). I also remember in South Sudan that the vegetables had to be FLOWN into the some of the projects from the capital because they were so scarce in some places..
So I would rather say: eat LOCAL (and stop providing Nutella for sure).

Avatar: Rosie Wilsom Rosie Wilsom
12/01/2022 15:56
  • Get link Get link
Giving people varied, healthy and cruelty-free food is not an imposition but is for public safety and animal welfare - it is no more strict than having security guidelines, which normally we are all happy to follow.
Please check the facts before making assumptions. 99% of animal and dairy products globally come from intensive farming. S. Sudan is a very specific context and is not globally representative. Plus I'm sure all the meat consumed was not produced by the farmer next door. In Liberia we had fruit/veg from the local market and meat and dairy from the middle-east/Europe.
While eating locally is of course the ideal, meat produced still has a much higher impact on the environment than fruit/vegetables/other plant foods produced further afield. Plant foods are more efficient to produce (you don’t need to feed them plants!), so they go further, feeding considerably more people than meat and dairy foods. So what you eat matters far more than where it comes from.
Avatar: Rosie Wilsom Rosie Wilsom
12/01/2022 15:58
  • Get link Get link

References because the above points are based on scientific research:

-https://ourworldindata.org/carbon-opportunity-costs-food

-https://viva.org.uk/planet/the-issues/food-miles/

-https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food

-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18546681/

Add your comment

Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.

Loading comments ...

  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • Rules Book
  • Legal terms
  • Download Open Data files
Decidim Logo
Creative Commons License
Website made by Open Source Politics with the decidim free software.

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

Forgot your password