This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
The Climate Action Accelerator
  • English Choose language Choisir la langue Elegir el idioma
    • Français
    • Castellano
Sign In
  • Home
  • Help

MSF - OCP's Global Environmental Footprint Initiative

Building MSF OCP environmental roadmap

Phase 2 of 5
PHASE 2: PROPOSALS 01/12/2021 - 15/01/2022
Process phases
  • The process
  • How-to
  • Phase 1 : State of affairs
  • Phase 2 : Proposals
chevron-left Back to list

Sterilisation VS single use

Avatar: Daoudal FX Daoudal FX
13/01/2022 15:05  
A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle...
  • Filter results for category: 1. MEDICAL 1. MEDICAL

List of Endorsements

Avatar: Thomas Balivet Thomas Balivet
Endorsements count1
Sterilisation VS single use Comments 0

Reference: caa-PROP-2022-01-310
Version number 1 (of 1) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: 31d8158777f8fb0c106622baf11f7ef67678e6d232a6145d3dc736d7ba4c8059

Source: {"body":{"en":"A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."},"title":{"en":"Sterilisation VS single use"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://participation.climateactionaccelerator.org/processes/OCP/f/49/proposals/310/embed.js?locale=en"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://participation.climateactionaccelerator.org/processes/OCP/f/49/proposals/310/embed.html?locale=en" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

0 comments

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed

Add your comment

Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.

Loading comments ...

  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • Rules Book
  • Legal terms
  • Download Open Data files
Decidim Logo
Creative Commons License
Website made by Open Source Politics with the decidim free software.

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

Forgot your password