This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.

MSF - OCP's Global Environmental Footprint Initiative

Building MSF OCP environmental roadmap

Phase 2 of 5
PHASE 2: PROPOSALS 01/12/2021 - 15/01/2022
Process phases

Changes at "Sterilisation VS single use"

Compare view mode:

Title

  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
Deletions
Additions
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}
Deletions
Additions
  • +{"en"=>"Sterilisation VS single use"}

Body

  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Deletions
Additions
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Deletions
Additions
  • +["A precise comparison of environmental costs VS quality of care in the choice of reusable or single-use devices would make it possible to refine the choice of materials. The question is not to go back to the reusable glass syringe but to evaluate the difference in environmental impact in the use of, (for example) reusable anaesthesia masks or single-use anaesthesia masks. This evaluation would include the aspects of production, transport, sterilisation, life cycle..."]
Version number 1 out of 1 Show all versions Go back to proposal
Version author
Avatar: Daoudal FX Daoudal FX
Version created at 13/01/2022 15:05